Table 1 Measurements of characteristics of the intervention, the inner setting and the outer setting of the implementing organization
CFIR Domain—Concept | Definition | Items (N) | Example Question/Statement | Reliability α |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention characteristics | ||||
Relative advantage | Degree to which Active Plus is perceived as being superior to other PA interventions | 18 | Compared to other interventions, implementation costs for this intervention are low. Totally disagree (1) to Totally agree (5) | 0.91 |
Outcome expectancy | Quality and validity of evidence supporting the belief that Active Plus will have desired outcomes and that effects are observable to others | 13 | By implementing this intervention, PA behaviour of people aged over 65 within our region will increase Totally disagree (1) to Totally agree (5) | 0.95 |
Complexity | Degree to which Actief Plus is perceived as difficult to understand and use | 5 | Implementing Active Plus is uncomplicated. Totally disagree (1) to Totally agree (5) | 0.66 |
Inner setting | ||||
Perceived task responsibility | Perception of the organization that he or she is responsible for intervention implementation | 7 | It is our organisation’s responsibility to stimulate PA among people aged over 65. Totally disagree (1) to Totally agree (5) | 0.83 |
Compatibility | Degree to which the intervention is perceived as being consistent with existing values, needs, and experiences of the implementing organization | 7 | The intervention corresponds with our targets Totally disagree (1) to Totally agree (5) | 0.87 |
Available resources | Sufficiency of resources to implement the intervention | 9 | Our organisation has sufficient staff capacity to implement the intervention. Totally disagree (1) to Totally agree (5) | 0.80 |
Self-efficacy | Belief in their own capabilities to execute courses of action to achieve implementation goals | 4 | I think our organisation is capable to implement the intervention. Totally disagree (1) to Totally agree (5) | 0.77 |
Relative priority | Perception of the importance to implement the intervention | 5 | Our organisation thinks it is relevant that people aged over 65 are sufficiently physically active. Totally disagree (1) to Totally agree (5) | 0.96 |
Outer setting | ||||
Subjective norm | Expectation that other local or regional organizations think that the municipality should implement the intervention | 8 | Welfare organisations think it is—Very unimportant (1) to Very important (5)—that our organisation implements this intervention | 0.93 |
Social support | Expectation that these other organizations will support the implementation | 9 | I expect to get support for intervention implementation from (other) MHC’s. Certainly not (1) to Yes, definitely (5) | 0.72 |
Intention to implement Active Plus | ||||
| Â | Â | 5 | Within one year, our municipality would like to play a role in the implementation of Active Plus. Certainly not (1) to Yes, definitely (5) | 0.87 |