Skip to main content

Table 5 Scores on implementation determinants

From: Promoting the implementation of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention: development and feasibility testing of an implementation intervention

 

Determinant scores, Mean (SD)

Sign. difference

 

Baseline measurement

(t0)

Interim measurement

(t1)

Final measurement

(t2)

Between implementers and non-implementers at t0

Within implementers over time (t0-t1-t2)

 

Non-implementers

(n = 16)

Implementers

(n = 8)

Implementers

(n = 7)

Implementers

(n = 8)

Mann–Whitney U

Exact Sig

Chi-Square

Asymp. Sig

Intervention characteristics

Relative advantage

2.82 (0.35)

3.41 (0.54)

3.29 (0.24)

2.72 (0.43)

35.500

.083*

7.600

.022**

Outcome expectancy

3.18 (0.85)

3.58 (0.19)

4.01 (0.48)

3.32 (0.33)

30.500

.513

6.000

.050*

Complexity

3.26 (0.46)

3.50 (0.55)

3.91 (0.43)

3.53 (0.58)

42.500

.475

1.600

.449

Inner setting

Perceived task responsibility

3.90 (0.65)

4.19 (0.23)

-

3.93 (0.55)

61.000

.130

2.667

.102

Compatibility

3.29 (0.46)

3.79 (0.09)

4.10 (0.30)

3.71 (0.20)

41.500

.040**

.316

.854

Available resources

3.10 (0.41)

3.19 (0.62)

3.48 (0.44)

3.14 (0.42)

32.000

1.000

1.500

.472

Relative priority

4.14 (1.03)

4.50 (0.33)

-

4.23 (0.47)

47.500

.659

1.800

.180

Self-efficacy

3.42 (0.73)

3.42 (0.49)

3.86 (0.38)

3.09 (0.61)

24.000

.776

10.182

.006**

Outer setting

Subjective norm

3.26 (0.73)

3.69 (0.42)

-

2.76 (0.58)

30.000

.491

2.667

.102

Social support

3.17 (0.47)

3.42 (0.26)

-

2.45 (0.80)

31.000

.414

1.800

.180

Intention to implement Active Plus within the next year

2.62 (0.84)

3.40 (0.61)

3.57 (0.66)

2.30 (0.69)

58.000

.085*

7.524

.023**

  1. *p < .10
  2. **p < .05