Table 1 Initial Program Theories

If abortion is a culturally sensitive issue, then researchers are well-placed to lead knowledge translation on this issue because their interests are safeguarded.

If the researchers view knowledge translation about abortion as part of their professional role, then they will dedicate resources to develop tailored knowledge translation strategies (i.e. the coalition).

If researchers are perceived as strategic partners by abortion advocacy groups, then they will be well-positioned to build a KT coalition with these groups.

If researchers frame the abortion issue in terms that align with the interests of potential coalition members, then these groups will be more likely to join the coalition.

If coalition members can participate in knowledge translation flexibly, then their involvement will be sustained.

If the coalition includes every group that policy makers would consult about abortion, then evidence to inform decision making will be available, consistent, and resonant.

If the coalition understands “the process of regulatory governance,” their knowledge translation interventions will be more effective because they target specific policy levers.

If the coalition raises the public profile of the regulatory issue, then it will be prioritized by policy makers.

If the coalition consistently delivers the same key evidence and message(s), then policy makers will have increased understanding of and confidence in the evidence.